Why would God command the death of so many people in the Bible (e.g., the Canaanites)?

  • God’s Judgment: Commands in the Old Testament addressed extreme evils like child sacrifice.
  • Cultural Context: Hyperbolic language (e.g., “wipe everyone out”) meant decisive victory, not literal extermination.
  • God’s Authority: As the creator, God has the right to give and take life; humans do not.
  • Temporary Laws: Old Testament theocracy was specific to Israel and not eternal moral law.
  • Christ’s Fulfillment: The New Testament renews principles, with Jesus completing the law.
  • Read in Context: Biblical passages require understanding their cultural and covenantal context.

(Book recommendation: Is God a Moral Monster? by Paul Copan.)

* * *

Thinking Apologetically on This Issue

  • Moral Standard Basis: Start by addressing the atheist’s claim—without God, moral judgments are subjective. Why is it wrong to call God immoral without a universal standard?
  • Defending God’s Actions: Emphasize that God’s actions were not arbitrary but were in response to extreme and persistent evil.
  • Divine Authority: Reflect on the concept of God as Creator, having the right to end and give life. This isn’t murder; it’s God’s authority over life and death.
  • Temporary Nature of Old Testament Commands: Recognize that the Old Testament laws were for a specific time and purpose, not universal moral directives.
  • Use of Context: Apologetically, always return to the context—historical, cultural, and covenantal—when explaining difficult passages.

How can a loving God send people to hell?

Why would God need people to worship Him (isn’t that egotistical and arrogant)?

Why does God remain so “hidden”?

Why does the “Old Testament God” seem different than the “New Testament God”?

Why would a good God allow suffering to exist?

Why would a good God allow evil to exist?

What are the practical implications of an atheistic worldview?

What key arguments are there for (and against) God’s existence?